116622

Model from 2002 with the grainy dial… I have eyed this reference for a while, after i sold my newer 116622 a while ago…. Now I joined the 16622 club

First time with this model. Looks awesome and wears more like a Daytona than a sub or gmt

You're one of those WPS members which "make" me keep my Daytona (by posting those), even though my 116520 (obviously not the same animal as 16520) doesn't speak to me so loudly... But after all, I don't let go of any of my pieces anyway... discounting the

Yachtmasters was always my thing, I was wearing my 116622 last couple of months and didn't feel like taking it off. I bought it "hungover" in 2009 during Oktoberfest, next to Hofbrauhaus in Munich. Never looked back, just grew on me...lol

A used 2000s Milgauss GV, 1980s "triple six" Sea-Dweller, or 1990s steel/gold Daytona all represent excellent value and potential fun without providing any revenues to Rolex. With the company's five year warranties on recent models, you can pick from many

..though I may regret the conversation I would have to have with my wife for buying another watch :/ Btw... Would there be any reason to lean towards the older reference 16622 vs. the newer 116622? Main difference I see is the clasp. I would like to hear

Hello community, I’m considering getting a 116622 Yachtmaster blue dial. I’m looking to put it through normal use (not a safe queen but not in a war zone). One thing that’s dissuading me from getting one (as opposed to an all-steel or ceramic bezel model)

While visiting the official Rolex Forum, I fell on their picture, which is normal, But also, which was more surprising for me, Rolex included some pictures posted on Instagram. Which is a pretty good idea, as these pictures have more soul than the officia

Hi, Paid a visit to a Rolex boutique this weekend to try on the 116234 Datejust 1 in stainless steel/white with white gold fluted bezel . By coincidence tried on the new yacht-master steel platinum 116622 with dark rhodium dial, which had been launched th